An editorial about the California decision
2 Comments
Links
Apologia
Catholic Calendar
The Christendom Review
CrazyAcres
The Curt Jester
The Daily Eudemon
Decent Films Guide
Dyspeptic Mutterings
Erik's Rants and Recipes
First Things
Happy Catholic
Hello, Self
The Inn at the End of the World
Mere Comments
My Domestic Church
Oblique House
The Pew Lady
Quiet Life
SFO Mom
Video Meliora
What's Wrong With the World
The Wine Dark Sea
Our stblogs.org brothers and sisters:
Catholic Calendar
The Christendom Review
CrazyAcres
The Curt Jester
The Daily Eudemon
Decent Films Guide
Dyspeptic Mutterings
Erik's Rants and Recipes
First Things
Happy Catholic
Hello, Self
The Inn at the End of the World
Mere Comments
My Domestic Church
Oblique House
The Pew Lady
Quiet Life
SFO Mom
Video Meliora
What's Wrong With the World
The Wine Dark Sea
Our stblogs.org brothers and sisters:
- Catholic Light
- Communio
- Pansy and Peony
- Revolution of Love Blog (Former Location)
- stblogs.org
- The Summa Mamas
- Vultus Christi
Categories
Monthly Archives
- June 2011 (2)
- May 2011 (1)
- April 2011 (2)
- March 2011 (3)
- January 2011 (5)
- July 2010 (6)
- June 2010 (24)
- May 2010 (44)
- April 2010 (24)
- March 2010 (2)
- February 2010 (21)
- January 2010 (4)
- December 2009 (2)
- November 2009 (9)
- October 2009 (12)
- September 2009 (28)
- August 2009 (23)
- July 2009 (46)
- June 2009 (43)
- May 2009 (28)
- April 2009 (33)
- March 2009 (46)
- February 2009 (37)
- January 2009 (57)
- December 2008 (56)
- November 2008 (60)
- October 2008 (74)
- September 2008 (41)
- August 2008 (24)
- July 2008 (39)
- June 2008 (26)
- May 2008 (32)
- April 2008 (33)
- March 2008 (20)
- February 2008 (46)
- January 2008 (48)
- December 2007 (24)
- November 2007 (24)
- October 2007 (14)
- September 2007 (20)
- August 2007 (37)
- July 2007 (21)
- June 2007 (17)
- May 2007 (64)
- April 2007 (42)
- March 2007 (42)
- February 2007 (26)
- January 2007 (37)
- December 2006 (49)
- November 2006 (32)
- October 2006 (36)
- September 2006 (36)
- August 2006 (55)
- July 2006 (56)
- June 2006 (22)
- May 2006 (27)
- April 2006 (14)
- March 2006 (30)
- February 2006 (29)
- January 2006 (47)
- December 2005 (34)
- November 2005 (44)
- October 2005 (44)
- September 2005 (54)
- August 2005 (45)
- July 2005 (26)
- June 2005 (40)
- May 2005 (45)
- April 2005 (59)
- March 2005 (90)
- February 2005 (69)
- January 2005 (61)
- December 2004 (56)
- November 2004 (58)
- October 2004 (67)
- September 2004 (56)
- August 2004 (47)
- July 2004 (50)
- June 2004 (45)
- May 2004 (79)
- April 2004 (59)
- March 2004 (96)
- February 2004 (97)
- January 2004 (72)
Pages
Search
About this Entry
This page contains a single entry by MamaT published on March 3, 2004 8:00 AM.
New blog to check out was the previous entry in this blog.
Interesting book review is the next entry in this blog.
Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.
can they not sidestep by refusing to provide prescription coverage?
They can get a plan that does not provide Rx coverage, and probably save a mint on it - and they could even supplement that with a medical spending account that could be used for prescription drugs, OTC items, chiropractic, dental etc. The problem might be to find an insurance company that offers that kind of plan. Or they could cover drugs for acute illness (3 weeks or less medication) only, or chronic illness only after the first $50/month is paid out of pocket, and those would also eliminate contraception for the most part.
Once again, the problem is finding an insurance company that will write a plan that isn't cookie cutter.